On Feelings: Part Two
What changes when we know feelings are not caused?
In my last post—now months ago owing to moving!—we established that feelings are not caused
In other words, I generate my own feelings and I attach them to things in the world around me: events, the actions of others, accidents, even the weather
Think about it: how can weather be bad? Or good, for that matter? Weather is a general term for the barometric and atmospheric conditions that are features of the layer of air around the earth (which makes human and other life possible)
We typically react to the weather by employing the feelings we’ve attached—or learned to attach—to the constantly varying air
When my children were small I noticed that—during outings like picnicking or camping—they would play cheerfully in whatever conditions there were that day
We’d chosen a rainy weekend to go car camping and even I felt miserable doing the work of tent-erection, food prep, etc.
The children, though, were running about the woods and the edge of the nearby lake, looking for dry firewood, skipping rocks, commenting on the patterns of the raindrops on the water, and so on
They didn’t attach any negative feelings to the day; only their parents did
A major contributor to general human unhappiness are expectations: I plan an activity and without thinking about it I expect the weather to fit my plans; that is, I attach feelings in advance to the conditions on a future day
You probably recognize experiencing this sort of conflict between expectations and reality; they’re easy to notice with only a little reflection
The feelings we attach to the actions of others involve a deeper form of expectations; these are the ones we meet in false but familiar claims about how “it drives me crazy when…” or “I can’t stand it that…”
The presumption is that the actions of others cause me to feel the way I do; but that is always false; feelings are not caused
It’s just that we all acquire or create many deep-seated expectations about how others should behave
Note the “should” in that last phrase: it denotes moral judgment
The second most common contributor to unhappiness is moralizing
That is, attaching moral terms—good, bad, right, wrong—to conduct which simply doesn’t match my expectations
Of course moral judgments can and should be made, but only in accordance with some shared standards
Expectations, like feelings—especially the deep-seated ones—are typically not shared; I very likely do not even notice or acknowledge them to myself
So what follows from this? First, I have to examine my feelings when they are aroused; every time I’m tempted to say “It makes me…” provides an opportunity, because it’s always false to say anything makes me feel one way or another
This observation has the startling consequence of rendering all the blues and love songs mistaken! You never hurt me—though my expectations were evidently not met (or even stated!)—nor made me happy either. Wow…
I hope (a form of expectation, note) the point is clearer; I look forward to comments; next time we’ll address the question What is religion?

Great article John. So true yet so easy to forget.
Hello John Nice discussion and Stoic I’d suggest that your approach does not validate the initial feeling ,that first feeling that arises when a painful action is thrown your way The first arrow ala Buddha ‘s Salatha Sutta. This first arrow causes the feeling. I find it is OK to sit with that feeling, validate, and let it dissolve ; impeding the second arrow , ie your own generated reactions